t2vsm6idn
Size for size, t2 is on average 51% cheaper than m6idn on demand in US East (N. Virginia), across 3 shared sizes. A burstable type against a general-purpose one with the same vCPUs and memory.
On-demand prices by size in US East (N. Virginia)
USD per hour for PostgreSQL, Single-AZ. Pick a size to compare the two types.
| Size | t2 | m6idn | m6idn vs t2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| large | db.t2.large $0.145 | db.m6idn.large $0.295 | ▲ 103% |
| xlarge | db.t2.xlarge $0.29 | db.m6idn.xlarge $0.59 | ▲ 103% |
| 2xlarge | db.t2.2xlarge $0.58 | db.m6idn.2xlarge $1.18 | ▲ 103% |
Key differences
The biggest lead each family has.
Where t2 leads
On-demand priceCheaper in 3 of 3 shared sizes
51% cheaperWhere m6idn leads
Sizes9 sizes here vs 6
3 moreLargest size128 vCPUs vs 8
BiggerKeep exploring
Each family's own page, and how it compares with others.