Dasv7vsFasv7
Size for size, Dasv7 is on average 33% cheaper than Fasv7 on demand in East US, across 7 shared sizes. Same size and generation, tuned for different work (general, compute or memory).
On-demand prices by size in East US
USD per hour for Linux. Pick a size to compare the two types.
| Size | Dasv7 | Fasv7 | Fasv7 vs Dasv7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Standard_D2as_v7 $0.0908 | Standard_F2as_v7 $0.137 | ▲ 51% |
| 4 | Standard_D4as_v7 $0.182 | Standard_F4as_v7 $0.273 | ▲ 50% |
| 8 | Standard_D8as_v7 $0.363 | Standard_F8as_v7 $0.546 | ▲ 50% |
| 16 | Standard_D16as_v7 $0.726 | Standard_F16as_v7 $1.093 | ▲ 51% |
| 32 | Standard_D32as_v7 $1.453 | Standard_F32as_v7 $2.186 | ▲ 50% |
| 48 | Standard_D48as_v7 $2.179 | Standard_F48as_v7 $3.278 | ▲ 50% |
| 64 | Standard_D64as_v7 $2.906 | Standard_F64as_v7 $4.371 | ▲ 50% |
Key differences
The biggest lead each family has.
Where Dasv7 leads
On-demand priceCheaper in 7 of 7 shared sizes
33% cheaperSpot priceLower in 7 of 7 shared sizes
Cheaper spotSizes10 sizes here vs 9
1 moreLargest size160 vCPUs vs 80
BiggerWhere Fasv7 leads
No clear lead on the measures we compare.
Keep exploring
Each family's own page, and how it compares with others.