t3vst3a
Size for size, t3a is on average 10% cheaper than t3 on demand in US East (N. Virginia), across 7 shared sizes. Same size and generation on a different processor.
On-demand prices by size in US East (N. Virginia)
USD per hour for Linux. Pick a size to compare the two types.
| Size | t3 | t3a | t3a vs t3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| nano | t3.nano $0.0052 | t3a.nano $0.0047 | ▼ 10% |
| micro | t3.micro $0.0104 | t3a.micro $0.0094 | ▼ 10% |
| small | t3.small $0.0208 | t3a.small $0.0188 | ▼ 10% |
| medium | t3.medium $0.0416 | t3a.medium $0.0376 | ▼ 10% |
| large | t3.large $0.0832 | t3a.large $0.0752 | ▼ 10% |
| xlarge | t3.xlarge $0.1664 | t3a.xlarge $0.1504 | ▼ 10% |
| 2xlarge | t3.2xlarge $0.3328 | t3a.2xlarge $0.3008 | ▼ 10% |
Key differences
The biggest lead each family has.
Where t3 leads
No clear lead on the measures we compare.
Where t3a leads
On-demand priceCheaper in 7 of 7 shared sizes
10% cheaperSpot priceLower in 4 of 7 shared sizes
Cheaper spotKeep exploring
Each family's own page, and how it compares with others.