Easv6vsFasv6
Size for size, Easv6 is on average 13% cheaper than Fasv6 on demand in East US, across 7 shared sizes. Same size and generation, tuned for different work (general, compute or memory).
On-demand prices by size in East US
USD per hour for Linux. Pick a size to compare the two types.
| Size | Easv6 | Fasv6 | Fasv6 vs Easv6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Standard_E2as_v6 $0.119 | Standard_F2as_v6 $0.137 | ▲ 15% |
| 4 | Standard_E4as_v6 $0.238 | Standard_F4as_v6 $0.273 | ▲ 15% |
| 8 | Standard_E8as_v6 $0.477 | Standard_F8as_v6 $0.546 | ▲ 14% |
| 16 | Standard_E16as_v6 $0.954 | Standard_F16as_v6 $1.093 | ▲ 15% |
| 32 | Standard_E32as_v6 $1.907 | Standard_F32as_v6 $2.186 | ▲ 15% |
| 48 | Standard_E48as_v6 $2.861 | Standard_F48as_v6 $3.278 | ▲ 15% |
| 64 | Standard_E64as_v6 $3.814 | Standard_F64as_v6 $4.371 | ▲ 15% |
Key differences
The biggest lead each family has.
Where Easv6 leads
On-demand priceCheaper in 7 of 7 shared sizes
13% cheaperSpot priceLower in 7 of 7 shared sizes
Cheaper spotSizes20 sizes here vs 9
11 moreLargest size96 vCPUs vs 72
BiggerWhere Fasv6 leads
No clear lead on the measures we compare.
Keep exploring
Each family's own page, and how it compares with others.