t4gvsm6gd
Size for size, t4g is on average 31% cheaper than m6gd on demand in US East (N. Virginia), across 3 shared sizes. A burstable type against a general-purpose one with the same vCPUs and memory.
On-demand prices by size in US East (N. Virginia)
USD per hour for PostgreSQL, Single-AZ. Pick a size to compare the two types.
| Size | t4g | m6gd | m6gd vs t4g |
|---|---|---|---|
| large | db.t4g.large $0.129 | db.m6gd.large $0.187 | ▲ 45% |
| xlarge | db.t4g.xlarge $0.258 | db.m6gd.xlarge $0.373 | ▲ 45% |
| 2xlarge | db.t4g.2xlarge $0.517 | db.m6gd.2xlarge $0.747 | ▲ 44% |
Key differences
The biggest lead each family has.
Where t4g leads
On-demand priceCheaper in 3 of 3 shared sizes
31% cheaperWhere m6gd leads
Sizes7 sizes here vs 6
1 moreLargest size64 vCPUs vs 8
BiggerKeep exploring
Each family's own page, and how it compares with others.