m6gdvsr6gd
Size for size, m6gd is on average 28% cheaper than r6gd on demand in US East (N. Virginia), across 7 shared sizes. Same size and generation, tuned for different work (general, compute or memory).
On-demand prices by size in US East (N. Virginia)
USD per hour for PostgreSQL, Single-AZ. Pick a size to compare the two types.
| Size | m6gd | r6gd | r6gd vs m6gd |
|---|---|---|---|
| large | db.m6gd.large $0.187 | db.r6gd.large $0.257 | ▲ 37% |
| xlarge | db.m6gd.xlarge $0.373 | db.r6gd.xlarge $0.514 | ▲ 38% |
| 2xlarge | db.m6gd.2xlarge $0.747 | db.r6gd.2xlarge $1.029 | ▲ 38% |
| 4xlarge | db.m6gd.4xlarge $1.493 | db.r6gd.4xlarge $2.057 | ▲ 38% |
| 8xlarge | db.m6gd.8xlarge $2.987 | db.r6gd.8xlarge $4.114 | ▲ 38% |
| 12xlarge | db.m6gd.12xlarge $4.48 | db.r6gd.12xlarge $6.171 | ▲ 38% |
| 16xlarge | db.m6gd.16xlarge $5.973 | db.r6gd.16xlarge $8.229 | ▲ 38% |
Key differences
The biggest lead each family has.
Where m6gd leads
On-demand priceCheaper in 7 of 7 shared sizes
28% cheaperWhere r6gd leads
No clear lead on the measures we compare.
Keep exploring
Each family's own page, and how it compares with others.