t4gvsm6g
Size for size, t4g is on average 13% cheaper than m6g on demand in US East (N. Virginia), across 4 shared sizes. A burstable type against a general-purpose one with the same vCPUs and memory.
On-demand prices by size in US East (N. Virginia)
USD per hour for Linux. Pick a size to compare the two types.
| Size | t4g | m6g | m6g vs t4g |
|---|---|---|---|
| medium | t4g.medium $0.0336 | m6g.medium $0.0385 | ▲ 15% |
| large | t4g.large $0.0672 | m6g.large $0.077 | ▲ 15% |
| xlarge | t4g.xlarge $0.1344 | m6g.xlarge $0.154 | ▲ 15% |
| 2xlarge | t4g.2xlarge $0.2688 | m6g.2xlarge $0.308 | ▲ 15% |
Key differences
The biggest lead each family has.
Where t4g leads
On-demand priceCheaper in 4 of 4 shared sizes
13% cheaperSpot priceLower in 3 of 4 shared sizes
Cheaper spotWhere m6g leads
Sizes9 sizes here vs 7
2 moreLargest size64 vCPUs vs 8
BiggerKeep exploring
Each family's own page, and how it compares with others.