t4gvsm6gd
Size for size, t4g is on average 26% cheaper than m6gd on demand in US East (N. Virginia), across 4 shared sizes. A burstable type against a general-purpose one with the same vCPUs and memory.
On-demand prices by size in US East (N. Virginia)
USD per hour for Linux. Pick a size to compare the two types.
| Size | t4g | m6gd | m6gd vs t4g |
|---|---|---|---|
| medium | t4g.medium $0.0336 | m6gd.medium $0.0452 | ▲ 35% |
| large | t4g.large $0.0672 | m6gd.large $0.0904 | ▲ 35% |
| xlarge | t4g.xlarge $0.1344 | m6gd.xlarge $0.1808 | ▲ 35% |
| 2xlarge | t4g.2xlarge $0.2688 | m6gd.2xlarge $0.3616 | ▲ 35% |
Key differences
The biggest lead each family has.
Where t4g leads
On-demand priceCheaper in 4 of 4 shared sizes
26% cheaperSpot priceLower in 3 of 4 shared sizes
Cheaper spotWhere m6gd leads
Sizes9 sizes here vs 7
2 moreLargest size64 vCPUs vs 8
BiggerKeep exploring
Each family's own page, and how it compares with others.