t4gvsm7g
Size for size, t4g is on average 17% cheaper than m7g on demand in US East (N. Virginia), across 4 shared sizes. A burstable type against a general-purpose one with the same vCPUs and memory.
On-demand prices by size in US East (N. Virginia)
USD per hour for Linux. Pick a size to compare the two types.
| Size | t4g | m7g | m7g vs t4g |
|---|---|---|---|
| medium | t4g.medium $0.0336 | m7g.medium $0.0408 | ▲ 21% |
| large | t4g.large $0.0672 | m7g.large $0.0816 | ▲ 21% |
| xlarge | t4g.xlarge $0.1344 | m7g.xlarge $0.1632 | ▲ 21% |
| 2xlarge | t4g.2xlarge $0.2688 | m7g.2xlarge $0.3264 | ▲ 21% |
Key differences
The biggest lead each family has.
Where t4g leads
On-demand priceCheaper in 4 of 4 shared sizes
17% cheaperSpot priceLower in 4 of 4 shared sizes
Cheaper spotWhere m7g leads
Sizes9 sizes here vs 7
2 moreLargest size64 vCPUs vs 8
BiggerKeep exploring
Each family's own page, and how it compares with others.