t4gvsm7gd
Size for size, t4g is on average 37% cheaper than m7gd on demand in US East (N. Virginia), across 4 shared sizes. A burstable type against a general-purpose one with the same vCPUs and memory.
On-demand prices by size in US East (N. Virginia)
USD per hour for Linux. Pick a size to compare the two types.
| Size | t4g | m7gd | m7gd vs t4g |
|---|---|---|---|
| medium | t4g.medium $0.0336 | m7gd.medium $0.0534 | ▲ 59% |
| large | t4g.large $0.0672 | m7gd.large $0.1068 | ▲ 59% |
| xlarge | t4g.xlarge $0.1344 | m7gd.xlarge $0.2136 | ▲ 59% |
| 2xlarge | t4g.2xlarge $0.2688 | m7gd.2xlarge $0.4271 | ▲ 59% |
Key differences
The biggest lead each family has.
Where t4g leads
On-demand priceCheaper in 4 of 4 shared sizes
37% cheaperSpot priceLower in 4 of 4 shared sizes
Cheaper spotWhere m7gd leads
Sizes9 sizes here vs 7
2 moreLargest size64 vCPUs vs 8
BiggerKeep exploring
Each family's own page, and how it compares with others.