t4gvsm8gd
Size for size, t4g is on average 42% cheaper than m8gd on demand in US East (N. Virginia), across 4 shared sizes. A burstable type against a general-purpose one with the same vCPUs and memory.
On-demand prices by size in US East (N. Virginia)
USD per hour for Linux. Pick a size to compare the two types.
| Size | t4g | m8gd | m8gd vs t4g |
|---|---|---|---|
| medium | t4g.medium $0.0336 | m8gd.medium $0.0577 | ▲ 72% |
| large | t4g.large $0.0672 | m8gd.large $0.1153 | ▲ 72% |
| xlarge | t4g.xlarge $0.1344 | m8gd.xlarge $0.2306 | ▲ 72% |
| 2xlarge | t4g.2xlarge $0.2688 | m8gd.2xlarge $0.4613 | ▲ 72% |
Key differences
The biggest lead each family has.
Where t4g leads
On-demand priceCheaper in 4 of 4 shared sizes
42% cheaperSpot priceLower in 3 of 4 shared sizes
Cheaper spotWhere m8gd leads
Sizes12 sizes here vs 7
5 moreLargest size192 vCPUs vs 8
BiggerKeep exploring
Each family's own page, and how it compares with others.