t4gvsm9gd
Size for size, t4g is on average 47% cheaper than m9gd on demand in US East (N. Virginia), across 4 shared sizes. A burstable type against a general-purpose one with the same vCPUs and memory.
On-demand prices by size in US East (N. Virginia)
USD per hour for Linux. Pick a size to compare the two types.
| Size | t4g | m9gd | m9gd vs t4g |
|---|---|---|---|
| medium | t4g.medium $0.0336 | m9gd.medium $0.0629 | ▲ 87% |
| large | t4g.large $0.0672 | m9gd.large $0.1257 | ▲ 87% |
| xlarge | t4g.xlarge $0.1344 | m9gd.xlarge $0.2514 | ▲ 87% |
| 2xlarge | t4g.2xlarge $0.2688 | m9gd.2xlarge $0.5028 | ▲ 87% |
Key differences
The biggest lead each family has.
Where t4g leads
On-demand priceCheaper in 4 of 4 shared sizes
47% cheaperSpot priceLower in 3 of 4 shared sizes
Cheaper spotWhere m9gd leads
Sizes11 sizes here vs 7
4 moreLargest size192 vCPUs vs 8
BiggerKeep exploring
Each family's own page, and how it compares with others.